In our [last post](https://blog.propelauth.com/chess-analysis-2-flask-and-cerberus/), we built a synchronous API that validates and analyzes a chess position. We noted that performing a CPU intensive task synchronously in the web server seems like a bad idea.

In this post, we’ll turn that synchronous API into an asynchronous one using Postgres.

## Analyzing the requests asynchronously

We cannot have our webserver waiting on an analysis. We also, ideally, want to be resilient to a large number of analyses requested at the same time overloading us. This looks like a good time to use a **queue**.

### What is a queue?

The basic idea behind a queue is that instead of analyzing the request immediately, we store it somewhere to be analyzed later, alongside an ID.

The user can use the ID to check if the analysis is ready.

Separately, some other service is running. It will read a chess position from the queue, analyze the position, and store the result somewhere. Services that read from queues and process them are typically called **workers**.

One of the many nice things about this approach is that you can scale up or down the number of workers depending on demand.

### How do we make a queue?

There are a lot of ways to actually implement queues. There are products like [Kafka](https://kafka.apache.org/) or [RabbitMQ](https://www.rabbitmq.com/). There are managed services like [AWS SQS](https://aws.amazon.com/sqs/) or [AWS Kinesis](https://aws.amazon.com/kinesis/). There are libraries like [Celery](https://docs.celeryproject.org/en/stable/) which can be used with Redis or RabbitMQ. For the workers, you can use serverless functions like [AWS Lambda](https://aws.amazon.com/lambda/) or you can have a pool of servers waiting for work.

In our case, we are going to use [Postgres](https://www.postgresql.org/) as a queue for two main reasons:

1. We’re going to need a database anyway, so using Postgres as both a queue and a DB means less stuff to manage.
2. I personally like debugging queues via SQL. We can get a ton of insight into what’s going on in a familiar language.

### Using Postgres as a queue

To make a simple queue, we ultimately only need three functions:

1. `add_request_to_queue(request)` - adds the request the queue, so it can be processed later
2. `claim_unprocessed_request()` - returns any request that hasn’t been processed yet. No one else should be able to claim this request until we are done.
3. `finish_processing_request(request, result)` - saves the result of processing a request.

It’s important that when a worker claims a request, no other worker can also claim it. Otherwise, we are just wasting time having multiple workers doing the same task.

Imagine we have a table named `queue`. `add_request_to_queue` for Postgres can be a simple SQL query:

```sql
INSERT INTO queue (id, request, status, created_at)
           VALUES (gen_random_uuid(), :request, 'unprocessed', now())
```

where `:request` is whatever information the worker needs to process the request. In our case, that’s the chess position that we want to analyze and any arguments.

A first pass at `claim_unprocessed_request` could be a simple select statement:

```sql
SELECT id, request FROM queue
WHERE status = 'unprocessed'
ORDER BY created_at
LIMIT 1
```

However, this doesn’t stop anyone else from claiming the same request.
Luckily for us, Postgres has two clauses that can help us out.

```sql
SELECT id, request FROM queue
WHERE status = 'unprocessed'
ORDER BY created_at
FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED
LIMIT 1
```

`FOR UPDATE` locks the row because we are planning to update it. `SKIP LOCKED` will skip over any rows that are currently locked. With this, no two workers will ever grab the same row.

`finish_processing_request` can be as simple as updating the row with the result of the analysis. We need to do this in the same transaction as our select statement (that is why we are using `FOR UPDATE`), so the overall flow becomes:

1. Begin a transaction
2. Select a request with `FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED`
3. Process the request
4. Save the result and make the status no longer ‘unprocessed’
5. Commit the transaction

## SQLAlchemy

Now that we know what we need to do, let’s translate it to python. We’ll use the ORM [SQLAlchemy](https://www.sqlalchemy.org/) to interact with our database and [psycopg2](https://pypi.org/project/psycopg2/) as our Postgres adapter.

```shell
# this is a library which adds some flask-specific features to sqlalchemy
(venv) $ pip install flask-sqlalchemy
(venv) $ pip install psycopg2-binary
```

You’ll want to set up and install Postgres, which you can do either with Docker or with their [installers](https://www.postgresql.org/download/).

Afterwards, we can set up our database table. In the earlier example, we had a `status` column. In this example, we are going to just use a nullable `analysis_result` column. This is a little less general since it doesn’t allow for error statuses, but should be easy to extend.

We’ll put our models in a new file `models.py`.

```py
from datetime import datetime

import sqlalchemy
from flask_sqlalchemy import SQLAlchemy
from sqlalchemy.dialects.postgresql import UUID, JSON

db = SQLAlchemy()

class Analysis(db.Model):
    # Let the DB generate a UUID for us
    id = db.Column(UUID(as_uuid=True), primary_key=True, server_default=sqlalchemy.text("gen_random_uuid()"), )

# The 4 parameters to our request
    fen = db.Column(db.String(), nullable=False)
    num_moves_to_return = db.Column(db.INT, nullable=False)
    time_limit = db.Column(db.FLOAT, nullable=False)
    depth_limit = db.Column(db.INT)

# The result of an analysis. Null means we haven't processed it yet
    analysis_result = db.Column(JSON())

created_at = db.Column(db.TIMESTAMP, default=datetime.utcnow, nullable=False)
    updated_at = db.Column(db.TIMESTAMP, default=datetime.utcnow, onupdate=datetime.utcnow, nullable=False)

# A conditional index on created_at, whenever analysis_result is null
    __table_args__ = (
        db.Index('ordered_by_created_at', created_at, postgresql_where=(analysis_result.is_(None))),
    )
```

We can then create this table from the python console.

```shell
(venv) $ python
# ...
>>> from models import db
>>> db.create_all()
```

## Finishing the API

We’re almost done with the API. Let’s look at the remaining code in `app.py` in sections.

First, make sure we set any SQLALCHEMY config values and call `db.init_app(app)`

```py
# ... same as before

from models import db, Analysis

app = Flask(__name__)
# This is the default URI for postgres
app.config['SQLALCHEMY_DATABASE_URI'] = 'postgresql://postgres:postgres@localhost:5432/postgres'
app.config['SQLALCHEMY_TRACK_MODIFICATIONS'] = False
db.init_app(app)
```

Next, we’ll update our `analyze` function to no longer analyze synchronously, but instead store the analysis to the database for later processing. The database will return an autogenerated UUID that we will return to the user.

```py
@app.route("/analyze", methods=["POST"])
def analyze():
    # Validate the request, same as before
    parsed_request = parse_request(request.get_json())

# Save an analysis object to the database
    analysis = Analysis(
        fen=parsed_request.get("fen"),
        num_moves_to_return=parsed_request.get("num_moves_to_return"),
        time_limit=parsed_request.get("time_limit"),
        depth_limit=parsed_request.get("depth_limit"),
    )
    db.session.add(analysis)
    db.session.commit()

# The id is automatically populated after committing
    return {"id": analysis.id}
```

Finally, we need some way for our users to get their analysis. We’ll create a new endpoint that accepts a UUID, validate that they pass in a UUID, and then fetch that UUID from the database. If the database object has `analysis_result` set, we know that it has been analyzed. Otherwise, we can say that it’s still pending analysis.

```py
def parse_uuid(possible_uuid):
    try:
        return uuid.UUID(possible_uuid)
    except ValueError:
        return None

@app.route("/analysis", methods=["GET"])
def get_analysis():
    # 404 if the ID is invalid or not in our database
    id = parse_uuid(request.args.get("id"))
    if id is None:
        return abort(404)
    analysis = Analysis.query.get_or_404(id)

if analysis.analysis_result is None:
        return {"status": "pending"}
    else:
        return {"status": "done", "result": analysis.analysis_result}
```

And that’s it for the API. We can submit chess positions to be analyzed, and we get back an ID. We can then poll the ID which will return `pending` until the analysis is ready. We can view this in action by running our server and using curl:

```shell
$ curl -X POST
       -H "Content-Type: application/json"
       -d '{"fen": "8/8/6P1/4R3/8/6k1/2r5/6K1 b - - 0 1"}' localhost:5000/analyze
{"id":"c5b0a5d9-2427-438c-bd4a-6e9afe135763"}

$ curl "localhost:5000/analysis?id=c5b0a5d9-2427-438c-bd4a-6e9afe135763"
{"status":"pending"}
```

The only problem now is that there’s no worker to actually analyze the chess position. We’re going to get back `pending` forever. Let’s fix that now.

## Creating chess analysis workers

In addition to being a webserver, Flask also supports a [CLI](https://flask.palletsprojects.com/en/2.0.x/cli/). We can make a command which loops infinitely reading from the database and processing what it finds. In production, we can use something like systemd to keep the worker alive, and we can control how many processes we spawn to control how many positions can be analyzed in parallel per machine.

Let’s start from the top, by making a `worker` command in `app.py`.

```py
@app.cli.command("worker")
def worker():
    with app.app_context():
        run_worker()
```

Then we’ll go implement `run_worker` in a new file `worker.py`.

```py
import time
from chessengine import analyze_position
from models import Analysis, db

# Runs forever
def run_worker():
    while True:
        try:
            did_work = fetch_and_analyze()

# If there was nothing to analyze, sleep for a bit
            #   to not overload the DB
            if not did_work:
                time.sleep(5)
        except Exception as err:
            print(f"Unexpected {err=}, {type(err)=}")

def fetch_and_analyze():
    to_be_analyzed = Analysis.query.filter(Analysis.analysis_result.is_(None)) \
        .order_by(Analysis.created_at) \
        .with_for_update(skip_locked=True) \
        .limit(1) \
        .first()

if to_be_analyzed is not None:
        to_be_analyzed.analysis_result = analyze_position(
            fen=to_be_analyzed.fen,
            num_moves_to_return=to_be_analyzed.num_moves_to_return,
            depth_limit=to_be_analyzed.depth_limit,
            time_limit=to_be_analyzed.time_limit
        )
        print("Analyzed {}".format(to_be_analyzed.id))
    else:
        print("Nothing to analyze")

db.session.commit()
    return to_be_analyzed is not None
```

And that’s the full worker. Most of the heavy lifting is done by `analyze_position` and you can use this same structure to turn any synchronous API into an asynchronous one.

Let’s test it by running our worker in a new terminal:

```shell
$ source venv/bin/activate
(venv) $ flask worker
Analyzed c5b0a5d9-2427-438c-bd4a-6e9afe135763
Nothing to analyze
Nothing to analyze
```

It found the request we made earlier and analyzed it. Let’s verify that by hitting our webserver with curl:

```shell
$ curl "localhost:5000/analysis?id=c5b0a5d9-2427-438c-bd4a-6e9afe135763"
{"result":[{"centipawn_score":null,"mate_score":-2,"pv":["c2c1","e5e1","c1e1"]}],"status":"done"}
```

And we see the status is `done` and our result is analysis that we expect.

## Wrapping up

We were able to take a clunky synchronous API and make it asynchronous, using Postgres as a work queue.
Our users can now submit bursts of chess positions and our servers won’t get overloaded.

In our next post, we’ll use NextJS to build a UI for our application. See you then!
